Unraveling the Scantibodies Lawsuit: Whistleblower Courage vs. Corporate Conduct

In the realm of medical diagnostics, the name Scantibodies Laboratory, Inc. once held prominence. However, a series of disturbing revelations, coupled with a landmark whistleblower lawsuit, has cast a long shadow over the company’s reputation. This article delves into the intricacies of the Scantibodies lawsuit, examining the allegations, the court’s verdict, and the broader implications for corporate ethics and patient safety.

Allegations of Unsafe Practices

In 2014, two former Scantibodies employees, Jeanette Nolasco and Brenda Taylor, filed a lawsuit against the company, alleging that they were retaliated against for raising concerns about unsafe practices at the company’s plasma collection centers. Nolasco and Taylor claimed that they had repeatedly informed management about irregularities in plasma collection procedures, including a failure to properly sterilize equipment and inadequate screening of donors.

A Jury’s Verdict

After a five-week trial, a California jury found in favor of Nolasco and Taylor, awarding them a total of $1.6 million in damages. The jury concluded that Scantibodies had engaged in retaliation, violating California’s Whistleblower Protection Act. The verdict sent a strong message that companies cannot silence employees who speak out about safety concerns.

Echoes of a Wider Controversy

The Scantibodies lawsuit is not an isolated incident. It highlights a persistent pattern of misconduct within the plasma industry, where profit often takes precedence over patient safety. The industry has been plagued by allegations of improper donor compensation, inadequate medical supervision, and the collection of plasma from high-risk donors.

Implications for Corporate Ethics

The Scantibodies case serves as a stark reminder of the importance of corporate ethics. Companies must prioritize patient safety and foster a culture where employees feel empowered to raise concerns without fear of retaliation. A company’s reputation is built on trust, and when that trust is eroded by misconduct, the consequences can be severe.


The Scantibodies lawsuit stands as a testament to the courage of whistleblowers who dared to speak out against wrongdoing. It is a victory for patient safety and a reminder that corporate accountability is essential for protecting public health.


What is the Scantibodies lawsuit?

A. The Scantibodies lawsuit was filed by two former employees who alleged that they were retaliated against for raising concerns about unsafe practices at the company’s plasma collection centers.

What was the outcome of the lawsuit?

A. A California jury found in favor of the whistleblowers, awarding them a total of $1.6 million in damages.

What implications does the Scantibodies lawsuit have for the plasma industry?

A. The lawsuit highlights the need for stricter regulations and oversight within the plasma industry to ensure patient safety.

What are the implications of the Scantibodies lawsuit for corporate ethics?

A. The lawsuit underscores the importance of corporate accountability and the need for companies to foster a culture of transparency and employee empowerment.

How can companies prevent similar incidents from occurring?

A. Companies can implement robust whistleblower protection policies, provide comprehensive training on ethical conduct, and establish open communication channels for employees to raise concerns.

What can the general public do to protect themselves from unsafe practices in the plasma industry?

A. Donors should research plasma collection centers carefully, ask questions about safety procedures, and report any concerns to the appropriate authorities.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *